Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:51:04 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.1 rm.c Message-ID: <200410041351.13214.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200410041126.i94BQ273055417@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200410041126.i94BQ273055417@repoman.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Monday 04 October 2004 13:26, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > des 2004-10-04 11:26:02 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > bin/rm rm.1 rm.c > Log: > Find out how flame-proof my underwear really is. From the committer-guide: "Good commit messages are important. They tell others why you did the changes you did, not just right here and now, but months or years from now when someone wonders why some seemingly illogical or inefficient piece of code snuck into your source file." Other than that, this seems to be an outcome of the *ongoing* thread in hackers. If there is any consensus in that thread, then it's that every such goof should be conditionalized by a environment variable. Any particular reason for this change? Any added value in this warning (I fail to see)? > Revision Changes Path > 1.30 +2 -1 src/bin/rm/rm.1 > 1.49 +23 -0 src/bin/rm/rm.c -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBYTkxXyyEoT62BG0RAmmbAJ9TgRVCWzQZuoxkXDTpDunBEH7rawCePmzT bjtUpmd9O4nU2++Qioq/C1c= =H/1R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410041351.13214.max>