Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:30:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203021] lang/python27: Install optional GDB integration tool(s) Message-ID: <bug-203021-21822-CsJA82eht7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-203021-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-203021-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203021 Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D10398 Keywords|needs-patch | --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7) > Could you include your patch as an attachment please, or alternatively (p= referred), open a Phabricator review (adding the review URl to the URl fiel= d in bugzilla). Done. > Can you also confirm: >=20 > - That the patch passes QA (poudriere) Do we have any cluster machines that can be used for poudriere? I'm moving= in two days and my FreeBSD machines are packed. > - To what extent this change should be made across all Python port versio= ns. Ideally, include the changes for the other port versions in the patch/r= eview as well It should be done for all Python versions (and the patch does). > - Whether this change (the addition of the file) should only be made when= the DEBUG port option is on, or unconditionally, with rationale if possibl= e. I don't see any reason to limit it to DEBUG. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-203021-21822-CsJA82eht7>