Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 22:13:47 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import Message-ID: <20040704031347.GJ6574@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040704024416.4b9463df.ubm@u-boot-man.de> References: <20040703231027.GA74329@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031907020.21004-100000@pancho> <20040704001816.GA91326@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040704024416.4b9463df.ubm@u-boot-man.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 04), Marc UBM Bocklet said: > Hmm, what I've been wondering for some time: Is there a perceivable > performance gain by using -Ox instead of -O? For most programs, yes. They also affect compilation time. Scott Robert Ladd has been running analyses of the various gcc optimization flags for quite a while, and has some comparison tables. http://www.coyotegulch.com/acovea/ -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040704031347.GJ6574>