Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:07:16 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: ady@freebsd.ady.ro, arch@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Help needed: ALTQ integration into FreeBSD Message-ID: <3C9ACA14.551C554A@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10203212217430.48394-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> <20020322094310E.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > Have you ever contact to Cho-san, the author of ALTQ? He is also a > FreeBSD committer (kjc@FreeBSD.org), and may willing to help you if he > have enough time to do. > > ALTQ implementation is already integrated into KAME; maybe KAME guys > can help you. I've heard a few days ago that a new FreeBSD committer, > suz (from KAME team itself), is approved by core, but his account on > freefall is *not* created (I dunno why but it's true) so he can't do > his work (sigh). Personally, I'm a little "gun shy" about KAME integration right now. The IPv4 IPSEC code has this nasty habit of reserving space for the IPSEC for non-IPSEC connections. This drops the maximum number of connections supportable by a given amount of RAM by a factor of 4 or more. I understand the need to alloc memory for the stuff when the connection is actually an IPSEC connection, but as it is, not using IPSEC, and just having the crap in your kernel has the bad effect on the maximum number of connections. I would really hate to see something else come in that was not conditionalized on it actually being used. 8-(. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C9ACA14.551C554A>