Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP is stable now.  Whee! :)
Message-ID:  <15074.138.446582.781725@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010420190822.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <XFMail.010420190822.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

John Baldwin writes:
 > Hey all.
 > 
 > Drew, Doug, and I have finally gotten this thing mostly whipped.  I haven't
 > done a buildworld yet, but I've built kernels and then booted them without any
 > problems.  There are still some issues with some of the accounting on SMP
 > systems, but UP systems should run fine with the current set of outstanding
 > patches.  I'd appreciate it if people could test the current set of patches. 
 > You can find them at:
 > 
 >         http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/alpha.smp.patch
 > 
 > So far this has been tested on a dual 4100 with both SMP and UP kernels.
 > Drew has found a problem with critical_enter/exit, but other than that I expect
 > it to run fine on SMP 2100's as well.  Also, SMP is noticably faster than UP on
 > the 4100 I have here to test on at least, which is a good thing. :)
 > 

I'm happy to report that with this patchset, plus the
cricical_enter/exit changes I just committed, a dual cpu 2100 made it
through a buildworld last night just fine ;)

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15074.138.446582.781725>