Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:15:23 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile ports/sysutils/conky ... Message-ID: <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> (Oliver Lehmann's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 %2B0100") References: <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org> <28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Oliver, On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: > > > > Was PORTREVISION bump really needed for those ports? > They have a hard or optional dependency to audacious so in my opinion - yes. I'm not sure what you do mean. What's the "hard" and "optional" dependency? And what changed at the main port that those dependent ports in your opinion should be bumped? -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58879204>