Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:26:51 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> Subject: Re: CARP carpdev Message-ID: <20120215082651.GO20404@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <1A41718A-076E-4EA8-9417-AF19FA8911E3@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <4F3A9237.5080901@barafranca.com> <CAOjFWZ59_ceWjiEWXHG_-rhUHAF571XDL-r0wL_gdiU5qqZgiw@mail.gmail.com> <4F3ADA5E.4060800@barafranca.com> <1A41718A-076E-4EA8-9417-AF19FA8911E3@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:33:43AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B> > On 02/14/12 17:33, Freddie Cash wrote: B> >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Hugo Silva<hugo@barafranca.com> wrote: B> >>> Looks like there's been conversations about porting this to FreeBSD since at B> >>> least 2007. B> >>> B> >>> Are there any plans to have ifconfig carpdev available in 9.0-STABLE? B> >> B> >> CARP support has been redone in 10-CURRENT, removing the whole "carp0" B> >> pseudo-interface support, and just enabling the CARP protocol on the B> >> existing network interfaces. This includes the equivalent of "carpdev" B> >> support. B> >> B> >> Search the -current archives for more information, CFT, and so on. B> >> B> >> I don't recall seeing anything about specific plans to MFC to B> >> stable/9, but could be mis-remembering things. B> >> B> > B> > B> > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=228571 B> > B> > The single IP limitation may be a problem in some locations.. B> > B> > Did not find anything about a possible MFC either. glebius@ is cc'd, perhaps he can add something, but based on http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/UPDATING, I don't think it's been MFCd (there's a primer for the new carp in current's UPDATING)\ B> B> B> There's no plans to MFC given it changes things significantly. B> B> I however wonder if someone wants to provide a user branch in SVN to B> provide regular patchsets for stable/9 and maybe even stable/8 (8.3R) B> to help people not going to HEAD? If you are hinting at me, I would not :P To get benefits of new carp(4) and updated pf(4) I'm running head in production. What I can do is providing information about exact revisions that I am running. Usually I update a single router, and wait for some time to prove its stability, then roll out a release from that revision and update other routers. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120215082651.GO20404>