Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:00:36 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Gleiser <fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Keith=20Spencer?= <bsd2000au@yahoo.com.au> Cc: fbsd <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: More..Re: ipf -> IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK ...This is not working as predicted! Help? Message-ID: <20021218095655.V52840-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <20021218021732.83180.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Keith Spencer wrote: > Hi again, > OK what I meant was apart from having changed an > interface (tun0 not ed0) the ruleset is identical. And > the rule set works! It dials out everything...It only > works iff the default_block option is not active. > As you can see quick is there. So how can it be that I > do exactly what Marty S does and no one else reports > hassles with it? Any clues Fer et al? Yes. First: send *the rules file YOU are using*, to the one you used as a base and then modified. Second: answer all the questions I made in an earlier mail and post them. Third: post the output of 'ifconfig -a', 'ipfstat -hio' Fer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021218095655.V52840-100000>