Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:57:06 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Subject:   Re: SF Bay area hackfest
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241255370.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040324195338.GC8779@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:36:35PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > TLS is "kernel invisible" (other than what we have already done to make
> > %gs point where we need it.) ((or the equivalent in other 
> > architectures)
> > so there is no kernel work..
> 
> Uh, who is going to investigate the situation on the other platforms and
> make any needed changes?  Lack of that is also a deal breaker.  I won't
> participate in TLS if it is going to be yet another feature that makes
> our platforms not on equal footing.
> _______________________________________________

The only feature that wil put them on an unequal footing is if the
toolchain support for one of them is incomplete, or we can not 
alter the run-time linker for one of them..
We designed the ABI for each to take TLS into account.


> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241255370.63489-100000>