Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:08:17 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@haven.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile Message-ID: <20050806.190817.128046221.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <25357.1123323114@phk.freebsd.dk> References: <20050806093614.GI48504@ip.net.ua> <25357.1123323114@phk.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <25357.1123323114@phk.freebsd.dk>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@haven.freebsd.dk> writes:
: In message <20050806093614.GI48504@ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
: >
: >On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:56:39AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
: >> phk 2005-08-06 06:56:39 UTC
: >>
: >> FreeBSD src repository
: >>
: >> Modified files:
: >> usr.bin Makefile
: >> Log:
: >> Put hesinfo(1) under buildoption "YES_HESIOD"
: >>
: >> Revision Changes Path
: >> 1.283 +5 -1 src/usr.bin/Makefile
: >>
: >Traditionally, this would be spelled "WITH_HESIOD".
:
: Yes, but I wanted to clear category for toplevel-only
: build options.
:
: The WITH_FOO have traditionally been used to control
: single programs, but you can't enable HESIOD in
: amd if it is not also in libc, so the YES_FOO options
: are intended to be usable only for buildworld and installworld
: targets.
I think we need to move to the NetBSD-like way of having
WITH_FOO/WITHOUT_FOO controlling MK_FOO getting set to yes/no (or did
I get that backwards). Sorting that out, however, might be a pita...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050806.190817.128046221.imp>