Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 01:19:34 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/rwall rwall.c Message-ID: <20020308011714.D1004-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020307131936.GH36653@hellblazer.nectar.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:09:20AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > I thought the point of (void) was to quiet lint(1). > > I like it especially in the case, as it means ``yes, I _meant_ to ignore > the result'' --- the author of this code is intentionally ignoring > truncation issues. > > OTOH, if the author added it just to quiet lint, it is a bit misleading. The point of it is to quiet all types of lints, including walking ones. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020308011714.D1004-100000>