Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 21:23:45 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Makefile.inc1 change Message-ID: <200001290423.VAA00501@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 29 Jan 2000 15:17:40 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001291516580.8352-100000@alphplex.bde.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001291516580.8352-100000@alphplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001291516580.8352-100000@alphplex.bde.org> Bruce Evans writes: : > So I should back this out? I didn't do a 3.3 buildworld. : : Of course. OK. I'm doing a 3.3 buildworld right now on a virgin 3.3R system. I'll let you know what happens with that. If it is a problem at all, then I'll back it out (since others have asked me privately to run the test and not back it out unless there are problems). The program that it was building was definitely the first pass of the fortran compiler. What in the tree needs this in order to build, even on the alpha? I could find only one .f file in the entire tree and it looked like a test file, which didn't seem to be referenced in the makefile at all. What's the alpha problem? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001290423.VAA00501>