Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:49:12 +0000 From: Maslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com> To: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: jgordeev@dir.bg, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vkernel & GSoC, some questions Message-ID: <319cceca0803171049hfea3248qaa3d5ec66a84f7a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170803162009h413e5a69v7f28a516e042120d@mail.gmail.com> References: <47DBC800.8030601@dir.bg> <160451205650165@webmail50.yandex.ru> <20080316122108.S44049@fledge.watson.org> <d763ac660803162006j66b5cdd4ob12e8c80829baa3b@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170803162009h413e5a69v7f28a516e042120d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, Aren't we working on a FreeBSD/Xen port ??? I think we don't need a Linux like KVM or DragonFly's vkernel, if we could run FreeBSD in dom0. Thank a lot On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 16/03/2008, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > Another avenue to consider is the Linux KVM virtualization technology, which > > > is seeing a high level of interest in the Linux community and sounds > > > increasingly mature and well-exercised. It would also offer interesting > > > migration benefits for Linux users wanting to try FreeBSD, allowing them to > > > trivially create new FreeBSD installs under their existing Linux install. We > > > had an SoC project last year but I'm not sure what the outcome was; it would > > > be useful to give Fabio a ping and see how things are going. Obviously, > > > anyone doing this project would need to manage the license issues involved > > > carefully. > > > > Wasn't part of the original KVM idea to support a "hypervisor" > > interface to a parent, sort of Xen-like, providing interrupt, VM and > > inter-VM "IPC" hooks? > > > > I remember seeing this stuff a while back but for some reason all I > > read about KVM - outside of what Redhat are doing with it and Xen now > > - focuses on hardware virtualisation. > > > > A BSD-licenced KVM hypervisor + FreeBSD kernel might be an interesting > > project. I'm pretty sure Rusty wrote a very very lightweight KVM > > hypervisor as a demonstration which may serve as a starting point for > > things. > > > Nope. It is called lguest, is GPL, IBM has the rights to it and has no > interest in changing the license. > > Using KVM for architectural ideas while starting from a fresh codebase > is really the only way to go if you are concerned with licensing. > > -Kip > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- System Programmer -- I'm Searching For Perfection, So Even If U Need Portability U've To Use Assembly ;-) -- http://libosdk.berlios.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?319cceca0803171049hfea3248qaa3d5ec66a84f7a>