Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:57:48 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h Message-ID: <400DB26C.FAA625D3@freebsd.org> References: <10340.1074638096@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <200401201730.58556.jhb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin writes: > >On Tuesday 20 January 2004 04:33 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> I suggest you and everybody else calm down and let dust settle for > >> a couple of days, maybe other people should have a chance to say > >> their opinion. If there is a clear concensus that this is bad > >> (maybe somebody neutral should take a count ?), then we'll back it > >> out. > > > >Sounds fair to me. I was keying off what I have seen so far of the thread in > >committers@. Partly it seemed that you had implied that myself and others > >who objected didn't care about how users felt or didn't want to bother in > >fixing reported bugs and that stung a bit. Nevertheless, the tone of my > >e-mail was quite a bit over the top, and I should have cooled off a bit more > >before replying. > > That's allright, no offense taken. Thank you guys. Lets concentrate on the technical and operational issues at hand and not (just) on the names attached to it. This ain't slashdot where only 2% read the article and 98% jump on conclusions based on the abstract in the post (or certain (anti-) buzz words). ;) -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400DB26C.FAA625D3>