Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:16:15 -0700 From: Arun Sharma <arun@sharmas.dhs.org> To: Fuyuhiko Maruyama <fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JVM and native threads Message-ID: <20010826101615.A11850@sharmas.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <55heuv0xtl.wl@tripper.private>; from fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 10:12:38PM %2B0900 References: <20010824233304.A32099@sharmas.dhs.org> <55vgjcqv87.wl@tripper.private> <20010825095746.A1015@sharmas.dhs.org> <55heuv0xtl.wl@tripper.private>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 10:12:38PM +0900, Fuyuhiko Maruyama wrote: > 2. Use the same extra threading library both in mozilla and J2SDK. Yes, that'd be the way to go. > How do you think about this? Using libc_r in J2SDK is most reasonable > alternative, isn't it? May be, if you're running java on uniprocessor machines all the time. > NGPT on FreeBSD achieves production quality before KSE based threading > isn't clear I think. I don't know either. All I know is I can use NGPT today, with programs like crafty (a chess program) and ORP (a java VM). Another thing I forgot to mention: NGPT today is non-preemptive. A "bad" user level thread can monopolize a kernel level thread and there's no defence against that. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010826101615.A11850>