Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:42:54 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gprof's broken in 7-CURRENT Message-ID: <474F78AE.5070107@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20071129233842.GA57951@ace.netcins.ceid.upatras.gr> References: <200711292024.lATKOq5R000769@freefall.freebsd.org> <20071129233842.GA57951@ace.netcins.ceid.upatras.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:24:52PM +0000, Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
>>> And to think that I mentioned this problem 5-6 months ago with gcc 4.2.x
>>> and now it finally gets publicity...
>>>
>> Did I just hear someone volunteered to be a guinea pig?
>>
>> Garrett, would you like to try out my fix? It's actually quite simple,
>>
>>
> [...]
>
>> This file is in the kernel tree, but the change only affects libc build.
>> If you don't want to redo a world build, you may copy the patched profile.h
>> to /usr/include/machine and "make all install" inside /usr/src/lib/libc.
>> Then re-link -pg compiled code and try it out.
>>
>
> Hi again.
>
> I couldn't wait for Garrett :) so I went on and tested your patch and
> gprof seems to work fine for me (at least for the executables I was
> interested in profiling anyway). This is i386 on a 7.0-BETA3 kernel and
> 7.0-BETA1 world. What are the chances for this to be committed in time
> for 7.0R?
>
> Thanks.
>
> \n\n
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr>
>
> iD8DBQFHT02Cm6J1ac+VFgoRAnaVAJ9n/WZY2nJU4Ym5qUFOBvg38p0lXQCfYDwT
> moIVew3+UhMLXLuJGEZd6HM=
> =J8RG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
I'll be sure to give it a toss when I get back home. I'd expect a
reply sometime tomorrow morning (PST)..
Thanks again for all of your work!
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?474F78AE.5070107>