Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:10:03 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Marc van Kempen <marc@bowtie.nl> Subject: Re: Future of Java question.... Message-ID: <20020621131003.A5413@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <3D130626.70609@bowtie.nl>; from marc@bowtie.nl on Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:55:34PM %2B0200 References: <20020621035341.A2383@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206202256180.26680-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu> <20020621041657.A2565@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20020620203124.E94323@agora.rdrop.com> <20020621043555.A2658@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu <20020621105727.A4515@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3D130626.70609@bowtie.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| As an interesting datapoint, the Orion application server (100% java), seems to | outperform apache when serving static content. Some of that may be attributed | to the java threading system versus forking, but it seems that the networking | layer is pretty efficient too. See, that I can understand. Java networking is clearly optimized. Maybe when Hotspot works under FreeBSD I'll see an even better improvement. I guess the runtime performance isn't too bad, it's the startup that seems to take so much CPU. Memory usage is high, but not really a problem. jm -- My other computer is your windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020621131003.A5413>