Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:21:51 -0500
From:      ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re:firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1
Message-ID:  <200908142121.51522.lumiwa@gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com 
 Thu Aug 13 02:16:24 UTC 2009 
Previous message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 
Next message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 
--On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM <lumiwa at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi!
> When I run
>
>
> ;
> portaudit -a
> Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1
> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities.
> Reference:
> <http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/49e8f2ee-8147-11de-a994-0030843d3802.html>;
>
> but when I check above site I found:
> Affects:
> firefox <3.*,1
> firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
> firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
> linux-firefox <3.*,1
> linux-firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
> linux-firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
> linux-firefox-devel <3.5.2
> seamonkey >0
> linux-seamonkey >0
> linux-seamonkey-devel >0
> thunderbird >0
> linux-thunderbird >0
>
> Are problem with  firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 or not, please.

That port should probably be removed.  It's ancient.

Use /usr/ports/www/firefox3 or /usr/ports/www/firefox3.5

Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
******************************************
WARNING: Check the headers before replying

I agree but for example if you want to install mplayer-plugin there are 
dependencies for firefox and you will have 2.0 again your disk.

-- 
Mitja
-----
http://starikarp.redbubble.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908142121.51522.lumiwa>