Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:27:55 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_poll.c Message-ID: <20050906012755.B34182@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050906061828.GQ41863@cell.sick.ru>; from glebius@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:18:28AM %2B0400 References: <200509051602.j85G2Bpo090258@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050905094341.A23343@xorpc.icir.org> <20050905180050.GB41863@cell.sick.ru> <20050905141451.A27290@xorpc.icir.org> <20050906061828.GQ41863@cell.sick.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:18:28AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Luigi, ... > The idlepoll thread is single. ok this is very good. Re. netisr vs idlepoll, perhaps a way could be to bump the idlepoll priority very high upon a net soft interrupt, and drop it down to its normal value once done with the netisr cycle. so we don't have to arbitrate among the two. cheers luigihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050906012755.B34182>