Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:54:51 -0600
From:      Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>
To:        'Aleksandr Miroslav' <alexmiroslav@gmail.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)
Message-ID:  <14952_1294437292_4D278BAC_14952_171_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF90FE@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimzv6QV0cS=LmSO%2BS--1NwqhhRz9zwZd4H4bJ8c@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTimzv6QV0cS=LmSO%2BS--1NwqhhRz9zwZd4H4bJ8c@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
After a bit of research I picked rsyslog.  Actually, my syslog servers "had=
" to be RHEL, so I have all my logs going to 2 servers; one runs rsyslog an=
d the other the syslogd that shipped with RHEL.  They have different retent=
ion policies, one keeps about 30 days of logs online, the other about 90 da=
ys.

Rsyslog has some cool features that may come in handy for a centralized log=
ging environment.  I don't use many (any?) of them right now, but it's nice=
 to know they're there.  Depending on your environment you may want to chec=
k it out.  It's really handy if you can replace your sending hosts syslogd =
with rsyslogd - if the central log server fails it will buffer log  entries=
 locally and then ship them when the server comes back up.  Also supports t=
cp based syslog and a couple other "lossless" protocols.  I have mostly Ci$=
co gear logging here so can't really replace their logging daemon!

HTH

G


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f=
reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandr Miroslav
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:09 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
syslog that come with the base OS?

thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"





<font size=3D"1">
<div style=3D'border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0i=
n 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14952_1294437292_4D278BAC_14952_171_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF90FE>