Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:14:04 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding ULE in GENERIC options Message-ID: <d7195cff0705242114n25c59102t1267a72f19572e96@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0705241507x4b77b922t1b9d0d1b32d0fa58@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0705241507x4b77b922t1b9d0d1b32d0fa58@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/05/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <almarrie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Just wondering why ULE isn't in the GENERIC options for -CURRENT? > > Is it good for dual xeon cpu and MySQL now? > I tried it on a desktop machine for a while and noticed no tangible differences. from /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES: # SCHED_ULE is a new scheduler that has been designed for SMP and has some # advantages for UP as well. It is intended to replace the 4BSD scheduler # over time. NOTE: SCHED_ULE is currently considered experimental and is # not recommended for production use at this time. AFIK, you cannot have both SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD in the same kernel, which is likely why it is not yet in GENERIC. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0705242114n25c59102t1267a72f19572e96>