Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:31:01 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@des.no> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20030717083101.GA51198@des.no> In-Reply-To: <20030717095257.C30394@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <200307141153.h6EBrJKk045346@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <20030715175821.K34004@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <xzp65m3vfw1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030715185438.GB15674@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <xzpy8yzty2m.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030715190456.GC15674@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <xzpn0ffts1c.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030717095257.C30394@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:58:10AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > I have no idea how a program can core in vfork(). Probably a vm problem? Most likely a KSE-related problem in vfork(). Try replacing vfork() with fork() in make(1) and see if the problem goes away. Warning: build times may increase significantly... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030717083101.GA51198>