Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami) To: jdp@polstra.com Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os Message-ID: <199904080058.RAA84894@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904080049.RAA76863@vashon.polstra.com> (message from John Polstra on Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:49:04 -0700 (PDT)) References: <199904080049.RAA76863@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> * Yep, alas, that's progression for ye. We have never supported mix * & match of sourceballs from different releases. We do our best * to support running old executables on newer systems, but that's a * completely different issue. : * I am only speaking for John Polstra, a compiler guy, here. Speaking for Satoshi Asami, the ports guy, I agree with John. I for one will hate to see the ports people having to worry about 4.0-gcc (they already have 4.0-egcs and 3.1-gcc to worry about...). -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904080058.RAA84894>