Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:23:07 +0200 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack) Message-ID: <404F40EB.6040702@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20040310154139.GA14892@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20040309214205.3EE2D5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20040309160821.P705@odysseus.silby.com> <20040310123237.V61186@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040310154139.GA14892@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis wrote: >> >> > >For that matter, there are sufficent drops on 10GbE from data errors to >insure that two boxes connected back to back won't achieve line speed on >a single TCP session. > > > Do you have data to back this up or are you just using broadcom chipsets? Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?404F40EB.6040702>