Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:17:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xorg in a jail Message-ID: <531ED4B3.7070003@dumbbell.fr> In-Reply-To: <531BF113.7060704@freebsd.org> References: <CAFHbX1JUzM%2BN9Zx=eCQdejvz1jAWcXNHepB2=5ZRuunu1gAG6g@mail.gmail.com> <531BF113.7060704@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 09.03.2014 05:41, James Gritton wrote: > The work to "properly integrate" the permissions got the kibosh for > just that reason. The kmem permission thing can stand on it's own, > but it's not going to be jail-triggered except in an unofficial patch. Why does Xorg require access to /dev/kmem and/or /dev/mem? Is this used by UMS drivers (but not KMS drivers)? -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTHtS4AAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMkMUQAKw9u27skh75kokmXMPVnLTN hvzhTcWajYU5j1F2BpDfge7xP3AxUU1Ry4oLnJcbqQgzOpYJXt1n+lXzX7YNNqFO UlOzXH8vWltToZL9djrqYRdeFOq5JNl5CwqoM/29cUoMROe0hiDWYlyqFghgqWqd yW+h+3yv2D0CQtU1ABUgwhcETrdB7NgvQcFfjtEDizylZdi6UAXtOTJmEnov0PhS lPRtWkFyRbtfDgmQpVMdcP62emT5tl+S7wZxnZIHqhdNcgbAp0vihuYxFsOxpToJ fadkbuJ9XyhBNbHbQDsz4V6MMyNL/j0dLSpszzRPNY0u+5xwUnm27wM5ZEfE9cHV 1n/E1zPVxxk3ocMnjn8P6aMm1ltDWuxtT/1YHiauvmTY90VpPn9dgLeCY9GKr3+4 6og/LRvrrIkv1gvLpSykmcPgnD7H4ReyYaa8ZA2cXRQyiavEFSQDdZL2v3Gmr7Ux BzlKUjuUMlEB21tLHn5q/3ah/eWccXfxAKCrLvYm5CzwgTLIo1vRlKn5zBevD+cc UtHi3yKkkMQw08zyvleWoKO00noFBHE+NZ3zQafja81uLBy0fc+o5ElElMcegFzf 6jbsmAf5lwUGlNWRq8avorrzF5Lq3RCDX9SmfTE7gW0PBSr77cpoN9Iu+mlZNMN/ HI6IzUafozR1SmIR6jGk =zp54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?531ED4B3.7070003>