Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:34:06 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233094] [meta] Base system tool chain modernization tracking
Message-ID:  <bug-233094-227-3dbnCnr6sW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-233094-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-233094-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233094

Sean Champ <lab+bsd@thinkum.space> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lab+bsd@thinkum.space

--- Comment #6 from Sean Champ <lab+bsd@thinkum.space> ---
While building without binutils in the base system, using releng/12.1 src, =
I'd
found what may be a couple of quirks, such that I believe may be informativ=
e if
not simply redundant here.

lib/libmd uses binutils under some build configurations (XAS defined, or not
MK_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP). I'm not sure if that's been patched for the upcoming
changes about binutils in the base system - maybe I've just missed it.

For any other changes that my local build configuration may have bumped int=
o,
such that I've noticed that those have been patched under the trunk/master
branch, will try to cherry-pick the changesets and test under local build on
12.1.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233094-227-3dbnCnr6sW>