Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:59:02 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403241557130.26506-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040324194600.GA8779@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > I don't quite understand why you need commitments for a toolchain > > upgrade. From what I understand, TLS support can't happen without > > it, and by deferring the toolchain update you prevent it from > > getting done. But I'll play along regardless... > > SMPng and KSE are both projects that haven't been completed because the > project only had commitments for the 1st part of the work. I refused to > pushed to import new toolchain bits for the to sit dormant not being > used. I'd rather use my time working on another part of FreeBSD if the > net of my time & effort is a NOP. OK, that's certainly valid. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10403241557130.26506-100000>