Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 17:31:59 +0200 From: Jakub Chromy <hicks@cgi.cz> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible bug: 11.2-RELEASE guest with vtnet and PF Message-ID: <305ba086-8a06-3967-87cd-dfbce41deafe@cgi.cz> In-Reply-To: <848b6851-89fb-b6c8-b412-d5ed897f63d2@cgi.cz> References: <848b6851-89fb-b6c8-b412-d5ed897f63d2@cgi.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
...
problem replicated with e1000 / em driver:
pass out quick on *em0* proto tcp from any to any keep state
->
pfctl: pfi_get_ifaces: Bad file descriptor
vs.
odine:~# ifconfig -a
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 58:9c:fc:04:aa:91
hwaddr 58:9c:fc:04:aa:91
inet ...netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast....206.223
nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
vtnet0: flags=8902<BROADCAST,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=80028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU,LINKSTATE>
ether 58:9c:fc:08:e0:c7
hwaddr 58:9c:fc:08:e0:c7
nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex>
status: active
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
groups: lo
--
s pozdravem
Jakub Chromy
CGI Systems div.
----------------
CGI CZ s.r.o.
sales@cgi.cz
775 144 257
234 697 102
www.cgi.cz
On 30.06.2018 v 17:07 Jakub Chromy wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I've just installed a 11.2-RELEASE guest under bhyve (hypervisor is
> 11.1-RELEASE)... and I cant use Virtio network interface with PF:
>
> odine:/boot/kernel# /sbin/pfctl -n -f ~/local/tmp/pf.work
> *pfctl: pfi_get_ifaces: Bad file descriptor*
>
> the file contains the following single line only:
>
> pass out quick on vtnet0 proto tcp from any to any keep state
>
> these are my interfaces:
>
> vtnet0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=80028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU,LINKSTATE>
> ether 58:9c:fc:04:aa:91
> hwaddr 58:9c:fc:04:aa:91
> inet *.*.206.214 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast *.*.206.223
> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex>
> status: active
> vtnet1: flags=8902<BROADCAST,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=80028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU,LINKSTATE>
> ether 58:9c:fc:08:e0:c7
> hwaddr 58:9c:fc:08:e0:c7
> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex>
> status: active
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
> options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> groups: lo
>
> I haven't noticed any other problems with vtnet0.... it is routing
> properly, everything works... minus Packet Filter.
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?305ba086-8a06-3967-87cd-dfbce41deafe>