Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:31:13 +0500
From:      Perevalov Sergey <perevalov84@gmail.com>
To:        pyunyh@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [axe][ue0] Device send packets but any host in network can not receive any packet from it.
Message-ID:  <4C0551F1.2010609@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100531223204.GE1577@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
References:  <4BE44E2D.6060907@gmail.com> <20100507210516.GI14801@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4C01760E.2080403@gmail.com> <20100531223204.GE1577@michelle.cdnetworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!
I tried it with crossover cable but results was the same bad. Then set 
debug flag hw.usb.axe.debug: to 15, and started ping -f from ue0.
And in /var/log/messages I found these strings:

Jun  1 22:28:34 laptop kernel: axe_bulk_read_callback:842: bulk read 
error, USB_ERR_CANCELLED
Jun  1 22:28:35 laptop kernel: axe_bulk_write_callback:870: transfer 
complete
Jun  1 22:29:12 laptop kernel: axe_bulk_write_callback:941: transfer 
error, USB_ERR_TIMEOUT
Jun  1 22:29:51 laptop last message repeated 4 times
Jun  1 22:31:40 laptop last message repeated 11 times

Then i googled it and found this
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-usb@freebsd.org/msg04388.html
the problem is described definitely like mine.
I read all thread and found the patch usb2_ethernet.patch2, but I havn't 
found
sys/dev/usb2/ethernet/usb2_ethernet.c file for patch.

how can I try to apply this patch to my system?
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-usb@freebsd.org/msg04403.html

Thank you very mach for your help!
//

//

On 01.06.2010 03:32, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:16:14AM +0500, Perevalov Sergey wrote:
>    
>> Pyun YongHyeon, I am really sorry, I have found you message in my spam
>> folder:-(
>> And immediately I did by your instructions.
>> I connected 2 Freebsd 8.0 hosts by one cable, and started tcpdump
>> -evvvvvvi rl0/ue0.
>>
>> So, 192.168.2.15 is receiver (rl0) log: http://pastebin.com/pZ5udweh
>>
>> 192.168.2.16 is sender (ue0) log: http://pastebin.com/BEDwUWBe
>>
>>      
> It seems both ends does not see any frames at all. I thought axe(4)
> sent wrong ethernet address to the other end but tcpdump output you
> posted makes me wonder cabling issue. I'm not sure whether
> rgephy(4) used in axe(4) can handle automatic MDI/MDIX crossover
> but rlphy(4) surely lacks the capability. Can you retest it with
> crossover cable instead of straight UTP cable?
> Also your tcpdump seems to indicate both hosts are trying to send
> packets. This makes it hard to know which part of NIC is not
> working. Send ICMP echo request on one host(e.g. ping(8)) and
> capture traffic on both sender and receiver side and post the
> result again.
>
>    
>> Thank you for your help!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08.05.2010 02:05, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>      
>>> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 10:30:21PM +0500, Perevalov Sergey wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi guys. I am beginner in FreeBSD.  And I got problem with my Gigabit
>>>> usb to ethernet adapter with AX88178 chipset. It works in windows very
>>>> well but doesn't work in FreeBSD 8.0. tcpdump shows log with received
>>>> and sent packets, but any host in network doesn't receive them from it.
>>>> I checked it with 2 FreeBSD hosts connected directly by cable. Can you,
>>>> guys, advice to me something to fix or to find reason of this issue?
>>>> I started thread on freebsd forums(
>>>> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=13649 ) and also reported
>>>> about problem ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146153 ).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> It seems the PR shows tcpdump output on sender side(axe(4)
>>> host 192.168.2.22). Would you capture the traffic on receiver side
>>> (host 192.168.2.7) and post the result? Note, please use direct
>>> cable to connect both systems and use option -e to capture traffic
>>> on host 192.168.2.7. For instance, use
>>> #ifconfig -envvvvvvi nic0
>>> on receiver side.
>>>
>>> Also check whether the receiver agrees on the resolved speed/duplex
>>> of established link. For your case, host 192.168.2.7 should show
>>> 100baseTX, full-duplex.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Here some information:
>>>>
>>>> dmesg:
>>>> ugen4.2:<vendor 0x0b95>   at usbus4
>>>> axe0:<vendor 0x0b95 product 0x1780, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2>   on usbus4
>>>> axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x02
>>>> miibus0:<MII bus>   on axe0
>>>> rgephy0:<RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface>   PHY 2 on miibus0
>>>> rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT,
>>>> 1000baseT-FDX, auto
>>>> ue0:<USB Ethernet>   on axe0
>>>> ue0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:c6:88:09:4e
>>>>
>>>> usbconfig:
>>>> laptop# usbconfig
>>>> ugen0.1:<UHCI root HUB Intel>   at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
>>>> (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen1.1:<UHCI root HUB Intel>   at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
>>>> (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen2.1:<UHCI root HUB Intel>   at usbus2, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
>>>> (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen3.1:<UHCI root HUB Intel>   at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
>>>> (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen4.1:<EHCI root HUB Intel>   at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
>>>> (480Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen4.2:<product 0x1780 vendor 0x0b95>   at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST
>>>> spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>> ugen0.2:<Optical Mouse Genius>   at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW
>>>> (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON
>>>>
>>>> ifconfig:
>>>> ue0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>   metric 0 mtu 1500
>>>> ether 00:0e:c6:88:09:4e
>>>> inet 192.168.2.22 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX<full-duplex>)
>>>> status: active
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for you help!
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>        
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards, Sergey.
>>
>>      
>    


-- 
Regards, Sergey.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0551F1.2010609>