Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:06:13 +0100 From: Sameh Ghane <sw@anthologeek.net> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.0R todo.sgml Message-ID: <20021120160613.GA43304@anthologeek.net> In-Reply-To: <20021120151222.GA24369@tara.freenix.org> References: <200211190032.gAJ0WoNq032778@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021119005344.GE16066@elvis.mu.org> <20021120151222.GA24369@tara.freenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le (On) Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Ollivier Robert ecrivit (wrote):
> According to Alfred Perlstein:
> > kernel: witness and invariants
> > userland: malloc
> >
> > any others?
>
> Working ACPI ? (although it may be too hard to do fro 5.0-R). Far too many
> machines have issues with ACPI :-(
Maybe it's time to import a new snapshot.
I was getting this error:
Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: <GBT AWRDACPI> on motherboard
Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: ACPI-0467: *** Error: GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1
block
Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: could not enable ACPI: AE_BAD_VALUE
Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6
and this small patch (from 20021101's snapshot) corrected this behavior:
--- evevent.c.old Wed Nov 20 15:49:34 2002
+++ evevent.c Wed Nov 20 15:53:34 2002
@@ -462,9 +462,13 @@
{
/* Check for GPE0/GPE1 overlap */
- if (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base)
+ if ((AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[0].RegisterCount) &&
+ (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base))
{
- ACPI_REPORT_ERROR (("GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1 block\n"));
+ ACPI_REPORT_ERROR ((
+ "GPE0 block (GPE 0 to %d) overlaps the GPE1 block (GPE %d to
%d)\n",
+ AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax, AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base,
+ AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base + (ACPI_MUL_8
(AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[1].RegisterCount) - 1)));
return_ACPI_STATUS (AE_BAD_VALUE);
}
Cheers,
--
Sameh
P.S.: By the way acpi power management functions backported to -stable would be
a great feature ! thanks John !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021120160613.GA43304>