Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:25:31 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements. Message-ID: <EB16056D-F5C1-4F0E-A97A-CAA17BB75F8E@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <200710172216.l9HMGhbd067251@apollo.backplane.com> References: <470E5BFB.4050903@elischer.org> <470FD0DC.5080503@gritton.org> <20071013004539.R1002@10.0.0.1> <47107996.5090607@elischer.org> <ff5vdh$jol$1@ger.gmane.org> <200710172216.l9HMGhbd067251@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I think the reason you see such a huge degree of virtualized and > para-virtualized environments these days is simply because service > providers can no longer provide all the web services individual > sites > need as a single common set of managed applications. I thought virtualization was used to address under-utilization of hardware and to provide better control over usage parameters that may be covered by SLAs... -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EB16056D-F5C1-4F0E-A97A-CAA17BB75F8E>