Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:47:08 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org>, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "re@freebsd.org" <re@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: release notes file
Message-ID:  <D5C285B1-F4B5-4534-B621-B713BED33F0C@cschubert.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPQ4ffsAr=neOdXnEv76No1fvv8378AFzzrd3s-5j40%2BrkU5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20190623191818.GA84365@raichu> <CAPQ4ffsAr=neOdXnEv76No1fvv8378AFzzrd3s-5j40%2BrkU5Zg@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On June 23, 2019 2:20:13 PM PDT, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org> wrote:
>On Sunday, June 23, 2019, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today we add a Relnotes tag to commits that warrant a release note.
>> My impression is that it doesn't work so well: if a committer forgets
>> or doesn't know to add one there's no way to amend the commit message
>> (same for MFCs), and a commit message isn't a convenient place to
>write
>> the text of a release note.  I would like to propose adding a
>top-level
>> RELNOTES file instead, which like UPDATING would document notes for
>> specific commits.  It would be truncated every time the head branch
>is
>> forked, and changes to it would be MFCed.  This fixes the
>> above-mentioned problems and would hopefully reduce the amount of
>time
>> needed by re@ to compile release notes.
>
>
>
>In the future with git you could easily add meta infos for specific
>commits. The project currently using this to store git-svn meta, but
>you
>can add more the one note to each commit.
>W
>
>
>
>
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> Index: RELNOTES
>> ===================================================================
>> --- RELNOTES    (nonexistent)
>> +++ RELNOTES    (working copy)
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +Release notes for FreeBSD 13.0.
>> +
>> +r349286:
>> +       swapon(8) can now erase a swap device immediately before
>> +       enabling it, similar to newfs(8)'s -E option.  This behaviour
>> +       can be specified by adding -E to swapon(8)'s command-line
>> +       parameters, or by adding the "trimonce" option to a swap
>> +       device's /etc/fstab entry.
>>
>> What do folks think?
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

It should be a .md file to format it properly on github. The more I think of it, a Makefile target to install it to / instead of /etc is more intuitive. 


-- 
Pardon the typos and autocorrect, small keyboard in use.
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D5C285B1-F4B5-4534-B621-B713BED33F0C>