Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:31:52 +0200 From: Nomad <mailman@crypton.pl> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.ps_showallprocs and procfs Message-ID: <20020928043152.GA75495@killer.crypton.pl> In-Reply-To: <20020927124625.M76190@babayaga.neotext.ca> References: <20020927113200.GB71234@killer.crypton.pl> <20020927124625.M76190@babayaga.neotext.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, if we tend to regard procfs as debugging tool only then maybe it shouldn't be mounted by default on initial instalation ? Anyway in Solaris it works without giving information of other's processes and still can be good debugging tool for root. Antique debate: hehe, maybe, but we waiting for 4.7 RELEASE and can do something with that in easy way (not mounted by default) without spend m Well: not 'we' because I am not developer of Free, but it can be done... I just don't like when my fried whose using OpenBSD and don't have procfs on default laugh at me :( On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:46:25AM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu wrote: > I tend to regard procfs as something of a debugging tool. If > you limit > it as is probably necessary to do what you suggest, its value as > a tool > becomes degraded. > -- Nomad [%% When you dance with the devil %%] [%% the devil don't change. %%] [%% The devil changes you. %%] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020928043152.GA75495>