Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:58:23 -0400 From: Matteo Riondato <matteo@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Renaming "FreeBSD" repo in /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf to "FreeBSD-ports" Message-ID: <590B86F2-6F9F-46BF-9569-03F72EA93B5D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5bece4af-0bec-457e-847f-7ca1cb031f86@freebsd.org> References: <05CD2AAD-31EA-471B-8028-A3902D7A4192@yahoo.com> <5bece4af-0bec-457e-847f-7ca1cb031f86@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Aug 19, 2025, at 8:25 PM, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 8/19/25 17:17, Mark Millard wrote: >> Colin Percival <cperciva_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>> With pkgbase being the intended way for users to manage 15.0 systems, >>> the current default /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf gives rise to confusion: It >>> defines a "FreeBSD" pkg repository which is in fact specifically bits >>> maintained *outside* of FreeBSD (and packaged via the ports tree). >> Not that I consider an appropriate answer obvious, but >> the file names as well as the content in the file? : >> /etc/pkg/FreeBSD-ports.conf ? > > I wasn't planning on changing the file name, no. Why is then this file named “FreeBSD.conf” ? It is unclear to me what the “FreeBSD” part of the filename is supposed to reflect, if this is just a file for configuring pkg. Perhaps this issue will be cleared after the FreeBSD -> FreeBSD-ports renaming. Thanks, Matteohome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?590B86F2-6F9F-46BF-9569-03F72EA93B5D>