Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:30:22 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net>
Cc:        emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Signal 12 on simple ldd / Linux
Message-ID:  <20070927173022.GA39854@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200709271700.l8RH0gtu018698@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
References:  <200709271700.l8RH0gtu018698@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 01:00:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 	FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p10 (Yea, I know, there are reasons)
> 	/proc and /linprocfs are mounted onto a point under an NFS mount point
> 		(This shouldn't matter since the fs is local still, no?)
> 
> 	When trying to ldd a binary, I get a signal 12. When I truss
> it, the last bits I get are :
> 
> 82825: linux_mmap(0xbfbfe82c)                    = 675115008 (0x283d7000)
> 82825: #243()                                    ERR#78 'Function not implemente
> d'
> SIGNAL 12 (SIGSYS)
> SIGNAL 12 (SIGSYS)
> Process stopped because of:  16
> process exit, rval = 140
> Bad system call

syscall 243 is set_thread_area.. TLS stuff. It was implemented in 7-current.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070927173022.GA39854>