Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 03:14:48 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@astral.msk.su Cc: ache@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc make.conf Message-ID: <199604161014.DAA18202@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199604161004.OAA00497@astral.msk.su> (ache@astral.msk.su)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I have make.conf common for several machines, some of them have shared * MOTIF, some of them not, I just want to be shure that static version * will be linked in _any_ case. Ah, I see. So you have some machines with dynamic libXm and you want the binaries built there to run on machines that don't have the dynamic libXm (it's irrelevant whether you have static libXm on these machines or not), right? That's a really odd setup, since the binaries go to /usr/local/bin or /usr/X11R6/bin, and if that's shared, isn't /usr/X11R6/lib (where the Motif libraries are) also shared among the machines? Or do you have the libraries (and dynamic libs only???) on the local disks of some machines due to licensing constraints? Or, do you really mean it's the problem of "make.conf" being common for several machines (as you say above), as opposed to the binaries being shared? If so, I still don't understand. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604161014.DAA18202>