Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Jan 2000 14:53:39 +1000
From:      Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au>
To:        Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au
Subject:   Re: Small fix to netstat argument processing 
Message-ID:  <200001070453.OAA13694@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>
In-Reply-To: <20000106210255C.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> from Yoshinobu Inoue at "Thu, 06 Jan 2000 21:02:55 %2B0900"
References:  <200001061006.UAA21698@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> <20000106210255C.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 6th January 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:

>Does these patches fix your problem, or should another better
>fix is desired? Please give me any opinions.

It passes all my tests.  Please commit it.  Thank you!

And earlier you wrote:

>Because now there is interface statistics display mode, when, e.g.
>
>  netstat -s -I bar0 -f inet6
>
>is specified. (though this is inet6 only now.)

I see where you are going now.  The syntax of netstat, already complex,
is becoming even more complex.  More detail in the man page will be
necessary soon.  Also, the "iflag" variable might have too many uses
now.  But this can wait, now that the immediate difficulties have
been resolved.

Stephen.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001070453.OAA13694>