Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:22:36 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r214409 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <4CC851CC.80509@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinzP%2Btj3y%2B-r4-%2BgHgCzg6BJ-ZpWru365zysSEF@mail.gmail.com> References: <201010270232.o9R2Wsu3084553@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=2dTVmB8Goj%2BNXq4F6SmZBNS3bxn8gLjmQ%2BdfV@mail.gmail.com> <4CC803A8.3040602@freebsd.org> <20101027082122.GD1848@garage.freebsd.pl> <4CC85552.2020100@freebsd.org> <20101027133307.GQ2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTinzP%2Btj3y%2B-r4-%2BgHgCzg6BJ-ZpWru365zysSEF@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[patch attachment was lost] on 27/10/2010 19:07 Garrett Cooper said the following: > How about this patch? I implemented this as a readonly tunable and I don't think that it's correct to call it a tunable or use CTLFLAG_RDTUN. As I understand it is a read-only sysctl. > sysconf tunable, because (AFAIK) the value that is being tested > shouldn't change during runtime after the system has been booted up, > and figuring that the value wasn't going to change it was better to > lose 4/8 bytes on the kernel stack instead of having to recompute the > value every time in a function call, with the associated lost heap / > stack memory in the process, as the assumption is that this libcall > was going to be called frequently by some programs. > Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC851CC.80509>