Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:06:05 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc.so dependency on libssp_nonshared.a Message-ID: <CAGSa5y0LFURkF2urpuDWXxib65qxF7a-5ZYA_SU_YOfU_h=GGg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150201202413.GA2132@reks> References: <20150201202413.GA2132@reks>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Gleb, On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb@freebsd.org> wrote: > I came across some build issues in libc.so and SSP. > > libc.ldscript (aka libc.so) unconditionally includes @@LIBDIR@@/libssp_nonshared.a > > libssp* are not built if WITHOUT_SSP defined. > > ObsoleteFiles.inc doesn't mention libssp*. > > Consider WITHOUT_SSP=yes case. As soon as one does clean installworld > and/or removes stale libssp_nonshared.a ld fails to link anything > because of missing libssp_nonshared.a I think nowadays it would make sense to get it of WITHOUT_SSP altogether. This will turn this into a non-issue. > libc.so during buildworld (as found under /usr/obj) is symlink to the > actual shared library, but not ldscript. Is it intentional? I wouldn't > expect make -C /usr/src/bin/cat to match buildworld result closely > assuming src and world are in sync, but they seem to have different idea > of what libc is.. I don't remember the details except this was pretty twisted :). I don't work enough on this subject to keep it warm in my head and each time I need to go back to it, it takes me hours. The code is here if you want to give a try: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk?view=annotate#l335 -- Jeremie Le Hen jlh@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGSa5y0LFURkF2urpuDWXxib65qxF7a-5ZYA_SU_YOfU_h=GGg>