Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:28:38 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com>, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/asmutils Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
Message-ID:  <20051130192838.GB76056@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051130144542.GA51725@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200511301349.jAUDnfoO032739@repoman.freebsd.org> <1133358970.85111.16.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20051130140838.GA49598@FreeBSD.org> <20051130141600.GB79912@voodoo.bawue.com> <20051130144542.GA51725@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:45:42PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:16:00PM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:08:38PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > What's so filthy about mkdirs? I personally enjoy seeing them in the
> > > > typescripts.
> > >=20
> > > I agree there's a fair amount of controversy with muting mkdir's.  Ba=
ck
> > > when I started porting things, I've observed that most ports actually
> > > muted those, so I followed that style.  Since there's no general rule
> > > right, I felt like keeping my ports consistent WRT this.  Again, I mu=
st
> > > say that I would be rather pleased if we'd finally come to an agreeme=
nt,
> > > with appropriate sentence in Porter Handbook.
> >=20
> > You wanna get an entry in PH whether to mute or not MKDIR's ?  It
> > just smells like another-useless-policy-request.  It's just a matter
> > of taste if you want to hide dirs creation or not.
>=20
> Not a request, but rather suggestion or some soft guide-line, and not
> only about MKDIR, but also CHOWN/CHMOD and other "non-purely-install"
> things.  Since we're sweep thru patch: target silently, REINPLACE_CMD's
> should be muted as well (and in fact, that makes the trush right now).

The guideline is "be sensible".  Muting simple commands is fine,
muting complex commands is just a pain in the ass when they fail and
leave you with a silent error.

Kris
--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDjf1mWry0BWjoQKURAhkOAJ407nF0t5A6mBCHnhf9gZF6x4tCAwCgtP1Z
MNMdu/zRUOtNq0Lz7zQF5/A=
=l+hC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051130192838.GB76056>