Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:28:35 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL benchmarks Message-ID: <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> References: <20050209205943.34c39e15.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > The difference between linux and everything else in those tests is so > significant even on UP, so that I suspect that something wrong with > the approach. no, I believe it to be accurate. however Mysql in default config is very well tuned for Linux, and you have to admit that 2.6 is a very nice kernel in some ways. > > > -Maxim > > Miguel Mendez wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Someone has posted a link to a newsforge article on the NetBSD lists >> that benchmarks MySQL performance on several systems, you can see it at: >> >> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/27/1243207&from=rss >> >> I don't know how much Linux-specific code there is in MySQL because, >> honestly, I always try to avoid it and go with PostgreSQL, but perhaps >> somebody with more MySQL-fu can fill in the blanks and confirm that the >> better performance seen on Linux systems is due to how the software is >> designed and not so much related to FreeBSD per se. >> >> Cheers, > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420BB5E3.1080504>