Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:29:23 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: /boot/mbr miscompiled? Message-ID: <1181165363.76200.3.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070606110525.H70149@wonkity.com> References: <20070606135815.GA913@darklight.abyss> <20070606145904.GA14456@rambler-co.ru> <20070606150536.GB875@darklight.abyss> <20070606153154.GB14456@rambler-co.ru> <1181144727.30405.30.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20070606110525.H70149@wonkity.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Warren Block píše v st 06. 06. 2007 v 11:48 -0600:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
> >> Hmm. The documentation bug was introduced recently in rev. 1.30
> >> of boot0cfg.8 (and merged into RELENG_6). I've just checked on
> >> 4.x, 6.x, and 7.0 systems here, and /boot/mbr could never be
> >> accepted by boot0cfg(8) because the second signature (the "Drive"
> >> string) isn't there. I've Cc:ed the committer of this change.
> >
> > And then, trust PRs. I wonder how is it possible that PR got submitted,
> > if the example showed in it is totally bogus? Escapes me.
> >
> > So, should I back out that rev.?
>
> Crap. Incorrect notes on my part, apparently from switching between
> boot0cfg and fdisk. Attached is a patch. My apologies.
Okay, committed.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
East or west, ~ is best.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBGZycvntdYP8FOsoIRAtDmAKCj6XXtdx152H4+kskSqSjzPPF54wCfYK5I
xsonORBZYTDzcET/iuGcixk=
=J6JC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1181165363.76200.3.camel>