Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 01:14:46 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma Message-ID: <3F55A2F6.210517BF@mindspring.com> References: <20030901165035.D58395@carver.gumbysoft.com> <3F53E2CA.9020101@freebsd.org> <3F53FD88.1050005@telia.com> <RnVxQfIjf6@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Meyer wrote: > > > Wouldn't fsck -> mount -> savecore -> swapon be a more appropriate order? > > Terry Lambert schrieb:, > > If you had small enough disks, large enough RAM, or could limit > > the number of CG bitmaps you had to simultaneously examine, then > > yes. Otherwise, no. > > Can't we get a knob in /etc/rc.conf to choses that per system? > > kind regards Dirk See Doug Barton's posting under the "Subject:" line of: savecore "check for a dump" patch for review Which provides a better solution than a blind knob. -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F55A2F6.210517BF>