Date: 03 Sep 1996 12:52:50 +0200 From: Frank Nobis <fn@radio-do.de> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is at(1) broken ? Message-ID: <ygepw4327lp.fsf@trinity.radio-do.de> In-Reply-To: Andreas Klemm's message of Tue, 3 Sep 1996 08:19:01 %2B0200 (MET DST) References: <Pine.BSF.3.95.960903081753.6295A-100000@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> writes:
Andreas> root{1008} ~ at 0830 /usr/libexec/uucp/uucico -r1 -x2 -Seasix
Andreas> at: incomplete time
Andreas> root{1009} ~ at 0830am /usr/libexec/uucp/uucico -r1 -x2 -Seasix
Andreas> at: incomplete time
Andreas> root{1010} ~ at 830 /usr/libexec/uucp/uucico -r1 -x2 -Seasix
Andreas> at: incomplete time
Andreas> root{1011} ~ at 08:30 /usr/libexec/uucp/uucico -r1 -x2 -Seasix
Andreas> at: incomplete time
Andreas> Am I doing something wrong or is there something broken ?!
As the manual told us:
DESCRIPTION
At and batch read commands from standard input or a specified file which
are to be executed at a later time, using sh(1).
Reading one command from the commandline would be a nice faeture, but is
not implemented.
Frank
--
Frank Nobis Email: fn@Radio-do.de PGP AVAILABLE
Landgrafenstr. 130 dg3dcn http://www.radio-do.de/~fn/
44139 Dortmund Powered by FreeBSD Fax: +49 231 7213816
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygepw4327lp.fsf>