Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:12:09 +0000
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190596 updated the upstream to use ld.lld to avoid ${triple}-ld [replaced overly generic ${linker} reference]
Message-ID:  <aiwTuUltjy8NwCPf@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <4cebda23-101d-40f4-ab8e-a3600117da9a@yahoo.com>
References:  <bf8452a8-a080-4f17-96ef-ab27b956ffa3@yahoo.com> <4cebda23-101d-40f4-ab8e-a3600117da9a@yahoo.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 02:30:33PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 6/10/26 13:19, Mark Millard wrote:
> > See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190596
> > 
> > For reference:
> > 
> > QUOTE
> > davidchisnall approved these changes on Apr 13
> > . . .
> > aokblast merged 3 commits into llvm:main from
> > aokblast:toolchains/fbsd_default_lld on Apr 13
> > END QUOTE

I wonder if we should backport this change to stable branches.  It would
be nice not to have to block building devel/llvm* when binutils is
installed.

-- Brooks


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aiwTuUltjy8NwCPf>