Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:59:04 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> Cc: Samir <samir.otmane@numericable.fr>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD but without jail Message-ID: <202512021359.5B2Dx4VL075037@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <8C497C07-E01C-47E3-93A5-4CD44141E6C2@freebsd.org> References: <f410fd52-cb62-4304-a74d-db31179a2459@numericable.fr> <8C497C07-E01C-47E3-93A5-4CD44141E6C2@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- Moin Rahman writes: > You can build your system with the following in your `src.conf` > WITHOUT_JAIL=yes That only prevents the userland programs notably jail(8) from being built. The kernel support for jails is tightly integrated, not controlled by an option. I dont think anybody has ever suggested, there even might be a measurable performance impact, so I'm a bit puzzled as to the goal might be here ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202512021359.5B2Dx4VL075037>