Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:03:22 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs_vnops.c Message-ID: <xzpeknk83xx.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040710095702.GK95729@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Sat, 10 Jul 2004 02:57:02 -0700") References: <200407091143.i69Bhbvt053927@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040709214357.GZ95729@elvis.mu.org> <xzpoemo8au5.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040710095702.GK95729@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> writes: > * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> [040710 02:34] wrote: > > you mean the fileno code? it's closely tied in with pseudofs data > > structures, and it's not nearly as efficient as the new fdalloc code. > Yes, the stuff in pseudofs_fileno.c, what is fdalloc? fd_alloc(), file descriptor allocation. it's basically the same thing: give me the next available number, remember that it's in use until I tell you it no longer is. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpeknk83xx.fsf>