Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:14:34 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimisation patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003241713500.84338-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <v0422080db501c0b61c4f@[194.78.234.186]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Whatever the official position is, it should be documented in
> /etc/make.conf, and warnings should be exceptionally clear and the
> potential consequences laid out as being exceptionally dire, if one
> was so "adventurous" as to enable them by default for all compiles or
> to enable them for the process of making the kernel.
Err, this thread started with a patch to do that, which is what we're
currently discussing.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003241713500.84338-100000>