Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:20:05 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r210054 - in head/sys: conf kern x86/x86 Message-ID: <201007141420.05688.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C3DED5A.3080806@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007141331.o6EDVRp2078644@svn.freebsd.org> <201007141241.36772.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C3DED5A.3080806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 1:01:14 pm Alexander Motin wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:59:46 am Alexander Motin wrote: > >> John Baldwin wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 9:31:27 am Alexander Motin wrote: > >>>> Author: mav > >>>> Date: Wed Jul 14 13:31:27 2010 > >>>> New Revision: 210054 > >>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210054 > >>>> > >>>> Log: > >>>> Move timeevents.c to MI code, as it is not x86-specific. I already have > >>>> it working on Marvell ARM SoCs, and it would be nice to unify timer > > code > >>>> between more platforms. > >>>> > >>>> Added: > >>>> head/sys/kern/timeevents.c > >>>> - copied unchanged from r210053, head/sys/x86/x86/timeevents.c > >>>> Deleted: > >>>> head/sys/x86/x86/timeevents.c > >>>> Modified: > >>>> head/sys/conf/files.amd64 > >>>> head/sys/conf/files.i386 > >>>> head/sys/conf/files.pc98 > >>> Can this be merged with kern_et.c, > >> They are different. kern_et.c provides event timer drivers API, > >> timeevents.c consumes it to manage kernel clocks. kern_et.c > >> theoretically can be used without timeevents.c if some other code > >> consume timers, for example, exposing them to user-level. > >> > >> May be names indeed cryptic a bit, but I had no better ideas. > >> > >>> or perhaps called subr_eventtimers.c instead? > >> Whatever you like, but why exactly so and why "subr_" important? > > > > The vast majority of files in sys/kern use some sort of prefix, either sys_*, > > kern_*, subr_*, etc. subr_ was just a suggestion to avoid clashing with > > kern_et.c. If timeevents.c is specific to clocks then maybe it should have > > 'clock' in its name somehow? Right now having kern_et == kern_eventtimer.c > > and timeevents.c is a bit ambiguous. Somehow making it clear that > > timeevents.c is for clocks might help. > > We already have kern_clock.c and subr_clock.c. kern_clock.c is quite > close by meaning. What's about kern_clocksource.c? Ok. I assume it would not be easy to just merge this file into kern_clock.c itself? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201007141420.05688.jhb>