Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:53:53 GMT From: Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 102137 for review Message-ID: <200607221153.k6MBrr7a030197@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102137 Change 102137 by piso@piso_longino on 2006/07/22 11:53:20 Updated. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/notes#7 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/notes#7 (text+ko) ==== @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ accessing the hw registers. The simplest solution would employ a spin lock, but i'm wondering about the performance penalty... ++ Review all the functions that override bus_generic_setup_intr() + and are unaware of filter model (tipically they record in a struct + just the *intr function and not the filter...) + Interrupt filters: - First Pass: filters exist, but you only get one or the other; also, each threaded handler has its own ithread. Also, this will probably break the
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607221153.k6MBrr7a030197>